During a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight nomination hearing in 2020, Aileen M. Cannon participated remotely to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The event took place in Washington and was documented by the U.S. Senate via AP.
The individual, described as a 58-year-old, who was accused of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump at one of his Florida golf resorts earlier in the year, is now seeking assistance from a judge who is known to be favored by the president-elect. He is requesting for his federal criminal trial to be delayed by almost a year.
Ryan W. Routh submitted a motion on Sunday, urging U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, to reschedule the prominent case from February 2025 to December 2025. This information was derived from court records examined by Law&Crime.
Routh asserts that going to trial in two months would deprive him of his constitutional rights as his counsel would be unable to provide a proper defense.
“Discovery delays and the extraordinary volume of discovery have made the current trial schedule incompatible with Mr. Routh’s due process rights,” Assistant Federal Public Defender Renee M. Sihvola wrote in the 18-page motion to continue trial. “The pace and quantity of discovery production, and the need to process disclosed materials into a usable form, prevent counsel at this time from providing a definitive estimate of the number of hours required for review. What is clear, however, is that the diligent efforts of counsel will be insufficient to prepare a case of this magnitude for trial on February 10, 2025. Proceeding with the scheduled trial or anytime soon thereafter – on charges punishable by life imprisonment – would result in a miscarriage of justice.”
Routh in September 2024 was arrested in Florida after a Secret Service agent allegedly spotted him with a rifle “in the exterior brush along the fence line near the 6th hole putting green” at the Trump International Golf Club as the former president golfed one hole behind. Authorities have said that the agent opened fire, leading Routh to flee the scene in a Nissan Xterra.
After Routh was caught, federal agents said they found a letter addressed to the “world” stating that “[t]his was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you.” Investigators also said that Routh had been camped out for some 12 hours apparently waiting for Trump to golf.
Routh was later indicted on charges of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer, being a felon in possession of a firearm, possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, and using a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence.
The case was then assigned to Cannon, who controversially dismissed special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal case against Trump for his alleged mishandling of classified documents.
Cannon’s assignment was not well received by Routh’s defense attorney, who in October demanded that she recuse herself from his case. Routh argued that Cannon’s appointment by Trump, her dismissal of the Mar-a-Lago case, Trump’s repeated praise of her as “brilliant” in public, and the “prospect” of a potential “promotion” to the U.S. Supreme Court all raised questions about whether she could be impartial in the attempted assassination case given her “relationship to the alleged victim.”
Routh later filed court documents questioning whether Cannon had truly been assigned the case at random
Federal prosecutors have backed keeping Cannon on the case, saying that Routh failed to cite to any legal authority requiring her recusal, offering little more than speculation without a “sufficient legal or factual basis[.]”
Cannon has similarly refused to step away from the case, saying that she is not required to do so.
“Defendant cites a series of factors which he believes, when viewed in their totality, create an appearance of partiality,” Cannon wrote in an October order responding to the recusal demand. “None warrants recusal, whether examined individually or together.”
After noting the fact of Trump appointing her to a lifetime judgeship does not by itself mean she needs to recuse herself (see: Trump v. Clinton), Cannon said she has “no control” over what Trump says about her, that she has “no ‘relationship to the alleged victim’ in any reasonable sense of the phrase” (since she’s never met him or spoken with him, “except in connection with his required presence at an official judicial proceeding, through counsel), said the “prospect of a judicial promotion” is wholly “speculative,” and said that the Routh case was definitely assigned to her randomly.
