UN agency with ties to Oct. 7 terrorists faces more issues as funding shifts in a new direction

Pressure continues to mount on the controversial U.N. agency UNRWA due to its alleged strong connections with terror leaders. These ties have fueled animosity towards Israel and fostered support for terrorism through its educational materials. Despite receiving support from 159 countries in the U.N. General Assembly, Sweden recently made the decision to halt its financial contributions to UNRWA. This move comes in response to a ban imposed on the agency by the Israeli government. Instead, Sweden plans to redirect its aid meant for Gaza to other organizations.

While various countries express solidarity with UNRWA, credible sources disclosed to Fox News Digital that not all U.N. members are in agreement on the matter. Behind the façade of unity, dissension persists among the ranks.

According to one U.N. insider, discussions have been circulating among several agencies regarding potential successors to oversee UNRWA’s programs. The United Nations Development Programme stands out as one of the prominent entities engaging in these behind-the-scenes talks.

“The UNDP has come forward and said that they can take over from UNRWA to advance peace,” the source said. They noted that U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres “shot those requests down,” leading to an “internal conflict.” The source elaborated that recent events “show that there are elements of the U.N. that recognize the challenges and clear issues with UNRWA,” but that “even as other agencies are ringing the alarm bells,” their “offers are being shot down at the highest levels” of the U.N.

Hillel Neuer, Executive Director of U.N. Watch, told Fox News Digital that aside from UNRWA, there “are several agencies on the ground who are doing significant work in distributing humanitarian aid.” 

“Around the world, when there is a crisis of some kind,” Neuer said that “you get a whole cluster of U.N. agencies,” including the World Health Organization, World Food Programme, UNICEF … and UNDP, which combine forces to “distribute aid to millions of people.” Neuer said that “the notion that is put forward that for some reason a tiny strip of land on the Gaza Strip is the only place in the world where those agencies cannot operate” is “absurd and false.” 

UN Watch has raised the ire of UNRWA by beginning to release a 150-page dossier showing URNWA leaders meeting with representatives of terror groups. Though UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini referred to the reports as “disinformation,” Neuer explained that UNRWA simply “cannot handle the truth.” Neuer said that UN Watch assembled its dossier by screenshotting data and photographs that were “hidden in plain sight” on the internet and social media.” He added that more of UN Watch’s dossier is set to emerge the coming week.

The U.S. was among nine nations to dissent from the General Assembly’s resolution in support of UNRWA. 

Ambassador Robert Wood, the alternative representative for special political affairs, explained the dissension on Dec. 11, both noting that while URNWA is a “critical lifeline,” the “resolution on UNRWA operations also has serious flaws.” Wood cited how the proposal fails “to create a path forward for restoring trust between Israel and UNRWA,” and that the resolution “denigrates Israel’s actions in Gaza without addressing the central reason for them, namely Hamas’ unprovoked October 7 attack and the terrorist group’s deplorable behavior in the interim.”

“More than 14 months into this conflict, some delegations here in New York cannot bring themselves to acknowledge — let alone condemn — Hamas’ role in instigating a conflict that has visited so much pain, suffering, and anguish on the people of Gaza,” Wood wrote, adding that “we deeply regret that the drafters chose to try to score political points, rather than pursue a resolution which could have provided unanimous support to UNRWA, addressed credible allegations about the activities of some of its personnel, and ultimately bolsters UNRWA’s vital humanitarian mission.”

While voting on UNRWA’s future, the General Assembly did note the issues with the agency, explaining that URNWA needed to implement the recommendations set by an independent reviewer and that there must be “immediate efforts” to address UNRWA’s “financial and operational crises.” 

The General Assembly also emphasized that it “strongly warns against any attempts to dismantle or diminish the operations and mandate of the Agency,” noting the humanitarian consequences that millions of Palestinians would face if its work were interrupted or suspended.

In an effort to assert the primacy of his organization despite snowballing evidence that its members have hindered efforts to create peace in the region, UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini penned an op-ed imagining the possibly “dystopian” outcome of a decision to dismantle UNRWA. Supposing that a two-state solution hinges on the agency’s continued operations, Lazzarini urged that “we still have a window of opportunity to avert a cataclysmic future where firepower and propaganda construct the global order.” 

 

U.N. Watch’s Neuer disagreed, noting “UNRWA is an arsonist masquerading as a firefighter,” he said. “Only by ending this terror-infested agency with the pathological aim of perpetuating hatred, resentment and dependency, can Palestinians move forward to a future of hope and peace.”