Mike Lindell heads into defamation trial planning to testify
Mike Lindell listens during an interview from the podium in the press briefing room of the White House, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Mike Lindell listens during an interview from the podium in the press briefing room of the White House, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is heading into his billion-dollar defamation trial this week with his verbal guns blazing, revealing in interviews how he’s planning to testify and “speak the truth” — saying, “I’m not going to incriminate myself! I’ve done nothing wrong.”

Lindell, 63, is being sued in federal court by Dominion Voting Systems after he “maliciously spread false claims” and accused the company of “rigging the 2020 presidential election,” according to Dominion officials. Jury selection was scheduled to kick off Monday, according to Colorado Politics, with U.S. District Judge Nina Wang — a Joe Biden appointee — overseeing the case in Denver, Colorado.

“If any attorney advised me not to testify or to take a deal, I’d tell them: ‘Never!”” Lindell told Rolling Stone last week.

“I speak the truth,” Lindell insisted. “I’ve been in many courts in my life, and ‘don’t testify’ is what they tell the guilty people, in my mind.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon‘s “War Room” podcast on Sunday and joked about brandishing one of his famous pillows after a lawyer in the case called them “lumpy” in a past interview.

“I told my lawyers, maybe I should bring him one inside,” Lindell said.

The case made headlines in April after Wang issued a scathing rebuke of Lindell for submitting a court filing allegedly rife with errors because his attorney allegedly used a generative artificial intelligence program, citing several court cases that don’t exist.

“These defects include but are not limited to misquotes of cited cases; misrepresentations of principles of law associated with cited cases, including discussions of legal principles that simply do not appear within such decisions; misstatements regarding whether case law originated from a binding authority such as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; misattributions of case law to this District; and most egregiously, citation of cases that do not exist,” Wang blasted.

You May Also Like

Request Made for Special Master in Case of Alleged Unlawful Deportation

President Donald Trump was seen speaking to reporters when he arrived for…

Video Shows Jail Escapee Pleading for Freedom on Instagram, Say Police

Left: The hole inside Orleans Justice Center where 10 inmates allegedly escaped…

Department of Justice Supports Unprecedented Claim in Abrego Garcia Case

President Donald Trump was seen in the Oval Office of the White…

Mother allowed disabled 18-year-old to deteriorate until he reached 80 pounds in weight.

Left: Naomia Prairie (Pennington County Sheriff’s Department). Right: Donny Merrival (Sioux Funeral…