SCOTUS hears arguments over transgender medical ban
Background: UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 4: Activists for and against trans rights protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court before the start of the United States v. Skrmetti case on Wednesday, December 4, 2024 (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images). Inset: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan speaks during an event at the Library of Congress for the 2024 Supreme Court Fellows Program hosted by the Law Library of Congress, Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024, in Washington (AP Photo/Jess Rapfogel).

Context: UNITED STATES – DECEMBER 4: Demonstrators both supporting and opposing transgender rights gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the United States v. Skrmetti case on Wednesday, December 4, 2024 (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images). In the small image: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan delivers a speech at an event held at the Library of Congress for the 2024 Supreme Court Fellows Program organized by the Law Library of Congress, Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024, in Washington (AP Photo/Jess Rapfogel).

The U.S. Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments Wednesday in a case with the potential to create groundbreaking legal precedent about the rights of transgender individuals to receive gender-affirming medical care.

The case centers around a Tennessee law enacted in 2023. The statute, SB1, bans both surgery intended to cure gender dysphoria as well as the prescription of hormone blockers for minors who are experiencing gender dysphoria. The law’s self-described purpose is to “protect the health and welfare of minors.”

But SB1 does not prohibit puberty-delaying medication or hormone therapy for all patients — only for those who would use the treatment to depart from a minor’s sex assigned at birth. Young people who use treatments to treat early or delayed puberty are still permitted to use the medications under the law.

The Tennessee legislature noted in the legislation’s text that the state “has a legitimate, substantial, and compelling interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex, particularly as they undergo puberty.”

Twenty-six states currently have similar laws banning gender-affirming care. Opponents of these restrictions argue that they are particularly harmful to transgender children, as research has shown that the restrictions have a severely negative impact on their mental health.

You May Also Like

Trump criticizes judge from the ‘extreme left’ who paused deportations

Left: Donald Trump speaks at the annual Road to Majority conference in…

5-year-old boy passes away from consuming meth in apple juice: Police

Left: Heather Opsincs. Right: Drug paraphernalia allegedly found at her Riviera, Florida,…

Mother arrested for toddler’s murder following disturbing letters

Alice Rollinson Idlett (Calcasieu Parish Correctional Center). A 75-year-old mother in Louisiana…

Attorney General urges State Supreme Court to halt Elon Musk’s $1 million promises

Elon Musk was at the 2022 Met Gala held at the Metropolitan…

Man kills housemate using a shotgun

Left: Cole Kolstad (Rice County Jail). Right: Brian Stoeckel (Boldt Funeral Home).…

Police discover bodies stored in storage unit by ex-funeral home owner

Inset: Albert Creath (WLBT/Instagram). Background: The mini storage units located at the…

Stepmother escapes long prison term for neglecting child

Jamie Strahm (KGW/YouTube). An Oregon stepmom was sentenced to just under two…

“Kidnappers Convicted for Torturing and Stuffing Victims in U-Haul”

Insets, from left: Frederick Rudolph and James Daniels (Florida Department of Corrections).…