Democrats are in a tizzy. After spending years shamelessly lying about Joe Bidenâs obvious mental decline, theyâve been forced to confront the reality that the emperor has no marbles.
So theyâre going to switch him out, just like that. So simple; so easy.
So ridiculous.
The reality of the matter is far more complicated. Even if those actually in charge (what Axios now calls the âBiden oligarchyâ) were convinced that they could lose, and even if they wanted to surrender their power and their money, that money canât just be switched over, not without torpedoing the campaignâs entire media strategy.
First, Biden campaign operatives are unconvinced by the media meltdown. They still truly believe theyâre the best chance of beating former President Donald Trump in November.
âBut what about California Gov. Gavin Newsom?!â the pundits might shriek. But the White House is more clear-sighted on the reality of the partyâs bind with Kamala Harris. The 2020 search for a competent and senior black woman willing to serve as vice president basically turned up a conspiratorial perennial loser from Georgia and the Californian who called Biden a racist and came in dead last in the party primary.
The party would have to pay full price, essentially torpedoing the ad-buy strategy.
The party chose the latter, and while the contract might not be signed in blood, itâs sealed with the race politics so central to the modern Democratic Party. Are Democrats âgoing to deny the nomination to the first woman, the first Black American, and the first South Asian American to be elected V.P.?â longtime D.C. journalists Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei ask. âHard to see.â
But even the people paid to like Kamala Harris do not like Kamala Harris. And for all the freak-out about the âgently alive corpse,â no one thinks she has a better shot of winning.
Second, power (and money). The Bidens are not the Clintons. They havenât had a quarter-century of trading power for money. There wonât be a long line of million-dollar speaking fees in Joeâs future, the books arenât selling, the surviving son is facing prison, and stepping down in embarrassment wonât change those realities â even if it is dressed up as âserving his country.â
Of course, the family members are far from the only people making money on this operation. Do the gatekeepers who have sneered at Harris for four straight years think sheâll keep them on the payroll? Even in the Fantasy Land scenario, do the campaign ad-buyers think Newsom wonât bring in his own team of loyalists?
This brings us to the third problem: money. The campaign canât simply transfer its money to another candidate. The Federal Elections Commission caps transfers from campaign to campaign at $2,000.
Sure, the Biden camp could transfer it to the Democratic National Committee (though not a PAC), but only campaigns are eligible for the lowest unit rates on advertising. The party would have to pay full price, essentially torpedoing the ad-buy strategy.
Of course, a new fantasy candidate could raise a bunch of money real fast, but even then there are handicaps. Individual donors can give $3,300 to a candidate in a primary and then another $3,300 for the general, but if there is no primary, that number is stuck mighty low.
So could Democrats just leave the Biden campaign in charge of the money and let him spend it on ads for the new candidate? Maybe. But that means whatever white knight (or black or South Asian) they have in mind will have a jilted lover in charge of the piggy bank. And then you run into the problems of coordinated expenditures, which are capped at $32,392,200. Reality is fun stuff.
In effect, this strategy would lead to leaning almost entirely on outside groups to hold the line and own the airwaves with no input from the campaign. Not exactly an ideal place to be.
Remember: The Democrats made this deal. In fact, they made both of them â back in 2020 when the only serious candidate on stage not calling for open borders and defunding the police was a 78-year-old white guy already fluctuating between hoarse whispers and old-man yelling. So they sprinkled the cupcake with Harris, leaned on the corporate media to sell it to the people, and lived comfortably and warmly for a few years in the little bubble theyâd created.
Thursday night shook up their snow globe, and in a panic, a whole lot of Democrats have put their hopes in more fantasy. Reality is at the door.
Axios: Behind the Curtain: Biden oligarchy will decide fate
The Spectator: The Democrats will struggle to throw Joe Biden overboard
Glenn Beck: Joe Biden keeps refinancing his home
Splinter: Top 5 potential Democratic presidential nominees
Blaze News: What replacing Biden might look like (and who’s standing in the wings)
The Federalist:Can Democrats just dump Biden and move on? Itâs not that simple
The Transom: You built this hell yourself, Democrats
Blaze News: Bill Ackman calls on nation to rally behind Trump; calls Newsom a ‘disasterâ
Sign up for Bedfordâs newsletter
Sign up to get Blaze Media senior politics editor Christopher Bedford’s newsletter.
IN OTHER NEWS
The big Friday (and Monday) at the Supreme Court
Monday is the last day for the release of Supreme Court rulings. That means weâll be getting word on the future of Trumpâs trials, specifically whether some of the former presidentâs actions in response to election shenanigans and on Jan. 6, 2021, qualify as official actions, immune from prosecution.
Friday was also a big day at the Supreme Court. In the biggest blow against the administrative state in decades, the court struck down the Chevron precedent in a 6-3 vote.
If youâre not familiar, the 40-year-old doctrine allowed federal agencies to interpret broad, vague congressional statutes themselves, making them a law unto themselves. It was a terrible precedent, and itâs finally over.
But that’s not all! The same morning, the court said the feds canât keep using an old Enron bookkeeping law to throw J6 trespassers in prison for years. The ruling doesnât set them free, but it gives them a cudgel to appeal in the decidedly liberal D.C. courts. Itâs the first big rebuke to the Department of Justiceâs extremely aggressive overreach and is good news â but donât expect it to be the last of this sordid tale.
Oh, and cities and towns no longer have to provide free housing to the homeless to enforce public camping rules. This seems basic enough, but Californiaâs Ninth Circuit had long maintained that you canât police vagrants and drug addicts and the criminally insane on your streets and in your public parks unless you built enough shelters for all of them. This is obviously crazy to normal people, and the Supreme Court agreed. So too did Gavin Newsom, whose national political future will still have to tango with the dystopian disaster the Golden State has become.
The Federalist: Supreme Court strikes a blow to the administrative state
Also Read More: World News | Entertainment News | Celebrity News
