Now the judge is arguing for the case to be tossed out, and her basic argument is that she is above the law:
According to her attorneys, the government’s prosecution of Judge Dugan faces numerous challenges. They argue that the main issue is Judge Dugan’s entitlement to judicial immunity for her official actions.
The concept of “judicial immunity” is brought into the spotlight, sparking discussion. While not a legal expert, the idea that breaking the law could be considered an “official act” seems questionable to contemplate. This prompts one to defer to legal professionals for a thorough analysis. As highlighted by Townhall columnist and “Inside the Law” host Phil Holloway, it becomes evident that the alleged actions do not fall under the umbrella of official judicial acts.
Who wants to tell Judge Dugan that whisking a wanted person out through a non public doorway…
And actively misdirecting federal agents who are trying to arrest said person …
Is not an official judicial act..
Who wants to tell her? pic.twitter.com/10GIPptcxZ
— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) May 15, 2025
