Minnesota state party chair Ken Martin has been chosen as the new captain of the struggling DNC ship, securing victory on the first ballot with 246 votes from the 428 members who participated in the voting process.
Martin is not a household name, but he’s well-known in political circles:
Having served as the leader of his state party since 2011 and holding the position of vice chairman of the national party, Martin also heads the Association of State Democratic Committees. This association advocates for state parties within the national committee, which has caused friction with other D.N.C. officials but is viewed by his supporters as a demonstration of his capabilities.
Referring to the acceptance of donations from wealthy individuals, Martin was quoted by Becky Noble stating, “There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money. But we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires.” This statement has raised some eyebrows and sparked curiosity among observers.
Democrats just elected a white male as their DNC Chair.
Ken Martin has so much diversity!
He’s who said it’s okay when Dems take money from billionaires because they’re the “good billionaires.” pic.twitter.com/F4UaFxOV2y
— Paul A. Szypula
(@Bubblebathgirl) February 1, 2025
Didn’t we get enough of Dem Minnesota politicians during the fall campaign?
The Democrats just chose Tim Walz’ “close friend,” Ken Martin, to be their new DNC Chair.
The Democrats still have no idea why they lost.
pic.twitter.com/dXU2rZed3h
— Alex Bruesewitz
In the leadup to the vote, the Democrats appeared not to have learned much from their recent disaster at the ballot box, and instead of focusing on the things people care about, they obsessed over what they think is the real reason they lost—“messaging.” Here’s the problem they haven‘t seemed to have figured out yet: if your message stinks, no amount of massaging it will help.
The vote at the D.N.C.’s winter meeting capped a monthslong race that focused on party mechanics and messaging, rather than on sharp ideological or establishment-versus-activist fights that have characterized other party leadership contests.
A failure to adjust:
