Supporters of MAGA express anger over undisclosed strategy to prevent Trump from assuming the presidency.

Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters are unleashing fury after a secret Democrat plan to block the president-elect from taking office was exposed. 

Two liberal legal experts shockingly argued this week that Democrats could block Trump from re-entering the White House.

According to an op-ed on The Hill, there is a provision in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution known as the ‘oath-breaking insurrection’ clause that could allow the rejection of Trump’s election certification.

Written by Evan Davis and David Schulte, both esteemed Ivy League-educated scholars with liberal leanings, the experts highlight the possibility of legally challenging the certification due to this clause. Schulte, in particular, has a close relationship with the Obamas and owns a property on Martha’s Vineyard, where the former presidential family often stays.

Davis and Schulte emphasize the ‘overwhelming’ evidence pointing to Trump’s involvement in the Capitol riot on January 6. They argue that Democrats should take action to prevent Trump from assuming office by obstructing the election certification process.

But it would require a two-third vote in the incoming Republican-controlled House and Senate to actually remove Trump, which would be a nearly impossible feat. 

Trump family members and MAGA allies quickly piled on to call out the ‘sick’ plan hatched by Democrats. 

Eric Trump wrote on X in response to the op-ed: ‘You people are sick.’

The president-elect closest adviser Elon Musk also chimed in on the ‘crazy idea.’

‘Such a crazy thing for them to say. Legacy media is just the propaganda arm of the radical left.’

Eric Trump wrote on X in response to the op-ed: ‘You people are sick’

Trump family members and MAGA allies quickly piled on to call out the ‘sick’ plan hatched by Democrats

Conservative commentator and former Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy also tore into the op-ed.

He called the plot one of the more ‘egregious abuses of power in history.’ 

‘The former editors-in-chief of the Columbia Law Review & of the Yale Law Journal want Congress to engage in what would be among the most egregious abuses of power in the history of the republic by overturning a democratic election & blocking a duly-elected president from office.’ 

Trump spokesman Steven Cheung accused Democrats of trying to steal the election.

‘Oh, look. Democrats want to steal the election and invalidate the will of the American people. Threat to Democracy,’ he wrote on X.

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck accused The Hill of helping along an ‘insurrection’ against Trump.

‘Sounds like @thehill is endorsing insurrection. Yes, try blocking the inauguration of a President who won the popular vote and the electoral college. Let’s see how that goes for y’all.’ 

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, on his Verdict podcast called the professors ‘numb skulls.’

‘Now the stupidity of this argument literally leaps off of every syllable, of every word that they have written.’ 

‘Trump derangement syndrome is real. It is a serious mental illness. These people are freaking nuts. They hate his guts. They’ve lost their minds, and at this point, understand these two numb skulls and every other Democrat who engages is in fantasy about this is an election denier and an insurrectionist,’ he went on. 

Former Democratic politician John Delaney even agreed that the plot is ‘nonsense’ and said Democrats must reject it. 

‘Trump won in a fair democratic process,’ he added.

If Democrats follow the advice laid out by Davis and Schulte, they would have to disrupt the certification of the election on January 6, 2025. 

Two liberal legal experts shockingly argued this week that Democrats could block Trump from re-entering the White House

Schulte is especially close with the Obamas, even owning the oceanfront Martha’s Vineyard home frequented by the former first family

The experts, Evan Davis (above) and David Schulte, are both well-known liberal Ivy League-educated scholars

That’s extremely unlikely to happen and not a single Democrat in congressional leadership has indicated that they will contest the election results. 

‘Disqualification is based on insurrection against the Constitution and not the government. The evidence of Donald Trump’s engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming,’ the experts wrote in the opinion piece.

‘The matter has been decided in three separate forums, two of which were fully contested with the active participation of Trump’s counsel.’ 

Davis told Newsweek that Democrats will consider taking action to keep Trump out of office because they already voted to impeach him over January 6.

If Democrats follow the advice laid out by Davis and Schulte, they would have to disrupt the certification of the election on January 6, 2025.

Trump’s allies are dismissing the plot as ‘egregious’ and say it will not happen

‘We wrote the piece to encourage attention to the Constitution either by rejecting electoral votes or by a 2/3 vote to remove the disability,’ he said.

‘The politics are intense though the law is clear. Should Trump be certified, unless the disability is relieved his administration will labor under a cloud of illegitimacy,’ he went on.

The uncovered plot comes after Chuck Schumer revealed how he has been working in the shadows to pack America’s federal courts with liberal judges in a bid to block Donald Trump’s policies.

Democrats are set to be largely shut out of power for the next two years, with special elections to replace Trump’s Cabinet nominees their only shot at recovering any of the Senate, House and White House. 

Schumer, who will remain Senate Minority Leader, offered a reason for optimism: the 235 federal judges Biden appointed during his term, one more than Trump. 

‘I don’t know exactly what he’ll do. But I can tell you this: The judiciary will be one of our strongest – if not our strongest – barrier against what he does,’ Schumer told Politico last night. 

The New York Democrat says he and Biden hatched a scheme at the start of his term to put confirming judges at the top of their agenda, sometimes even coming before passing policy goals. 

The president-elect closest adviser Elon Musk also chimed in on the ‘crazy idea’

Chuck Schumer believes there will be a judicial resistance to Donald Trump ‘s MAGA revolution after Joe Biden appointed one more federal judge to the bench than his predecessor

Schumer, who will remain Senate Minority Leader, offered a reason for optimism: the 235 federal judges Biden appointed during his term, one more than Trump

‘When we started out, we knew it would be a very difficult job to do more than Trump had done but we did,’ Schumer said.

While Biden will only end up sending Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, Schumer says this president’s nominees now make up 25 percent of the federal judiciary. 

It appears that will remain the case after the president infuriated Republicans earlier this week, vetoing bipartisan legislation that would have created 66 new federal judges.

As for Schumer, adding liberal judges is going to be a firewall against Trump repealing their policy accomplishments.  

‘We knew that getting more judges on the bench would help protect our legislative record,’ Schumer told Politico. 

‘The two did go hand in hand. If you asked me which one was more important, I wouldn’t want to pick among my children.’

The Senator says he’s only following the strategy put forth by George W. Bush’s White House.  

‘When I became majority leader, I said, ‘This is something we have to work on, we have to focus on.’