GAME ON: Trump Takes a Hammer to Birthright Citizenship, Says 'People Have Wanted This For Decades'

Within days of assuming office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that has sparked widespread misinterpretation, particularly being labeled as “ending birthright citizenship”. This simplification overlooks the complexity surrounding the understanding of citizenship within the 14th Amendment.

Section 1 of the amendment holds significant importance, as it states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s executive order aims to narrow the legal interpretation of this statement. The order instructs the government to withhold legal recognition of citizenship in cases where the individual’s mother was unlawfully present in the U.S. and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth, or when the mother’s presence was lawful but temporary, and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth.

In other words, if the parents are not in the United States legally, then the child is not automatically granted citizenship. 

Trump in Court

The executive order was immediately challenged in court in several states, with groups like the ACLU latching themselves onto the cause, and the Trump administration has already lost in at least one federal court. The judge in that case strongly rebuked Trump’s actions.

“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades,” Senior U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour said. “I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order.”

Coughenour (probably) has a point. The president cannot unilaterally reinterpret an amendment, especially on a question that the Supreme Court had previously settled. But the Trump administration isn’t seeking to just unilaterally change things. It appears his team wants to take this all the way back to the Supreme Court. 

But why?

What Is “Legal”?

The Supreme Court answered the question of birthright citizenship in the late 1800s, in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were legal residents, though not U.S. citizens, living in San Fransisco at the time. The family left America, though Wong came back and was denied entry into the country.

He sued, claiming he was a citizen, and the case went before the Court. Here is what they found:

  • Fourteenth Amendment Interpretation: The amendment’s language—”born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”—was meant to ensure that all persons born on U.S. soil (except specific exclusions) were granted citizenship.
  • Historical Intent: The Court emphasized that the amendment aimed to settle citizenship questions definitively, particularly for children born to foreign parents residing legally in the U.S.
  • Legal Precedents: The Court cited various precedents and interpretations of “jurisdiction,” concluding that Wong Kim Ark was fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction and thus a citizen.

The question comes down to one particular phrase in the amendment: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The Court interpreted it, like most do, to mean that everyone born in the U.S. was automatically “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” making them legal citizens. Some legal scholars, who agree with the Trump administration, argue that it means only those who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (meaning those whose families are legally in the United States) are recognized as citizens.

The Path Forward

The Trump administration could push this ahead, fighting to keep the issue alive all the way to the Supreme Court, forcing the current Court to re-evaluate what the previous Court ruled. 

There are really two ways that the change to our interpretation of birthright citizenship can happen. The first is through an act of Congress, which will probably never happen. The second is to get the Supreme Court to amend or overturn its previous ruling, which is difficult but not impossible. 

There are two objectives here:

  1. Get the Supreme Court to reverse the previous position that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” applies to everyone born in the United States.
  2. Recognize that, under this interpretation, Wong Kim Ark’s parents were “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” because they were legal residents in the United States.

If the Trump administration can convince the Justices to narrowly re-define the legal interpretation of the 14th Amendment, then his executive order will, in fact, have worked – even if the process by which he got there skirted the lines of constitutionality in the first place.

Can He Do It?

Trump’s problem is that he has essentially, two years to get things done. The midterm elections could result in Democrats retaking the House or Senate, and if that is the case, then he loses the opportunity to get much more of his agenda accomplished. Getting Congress to devote time to birthright citizenship takes away from his ability to get other things done, so he has to take the long way around – through the courts, that is.

He certainly could pull it off. He has just the right Supreme Court makeup to have a chance. The originalists on the Court will undoubtedly take a look at the fact that the original intent of the 14th Amendment was to apply to people legally in the U.S. (a fact that is in the congressional record, if you go and read up on what the authors of the amendment were discussing at the time). But it’s still a tall order.

Should He Do It?

In all honesty, I’m not convinced it’s the battle we should have right now. There are more immediate and critical needs in the fight to fix the immigration issue than to tackle birthright citizenship. However, it is something he promised, and he wants to deliver on it. 

It’s one of those long-game plans. This will have very little impact in the near future, but could work long-term to dissuade birth tourism in the U.S. For immigration hawks, it’s a vital piece of the strategy to reshape how America controls its borders and protects its citizenry.

You May Also Like
Donald Trump pardons glamorous gun-toting Nevada Republican convicted of using funds raised to honor a slain officer for plastic surgery

Donald Trump granted clemency to a Nevada Republican who misused charity funds for personal use.

Michele Fiore, a Nevada Republican figure, was pardoned by President Donald Trump…
Tutor Christina Formella charged for sexually abusing teen student at Downers Grove South HS, police say

Man faces aggravated assault charges for attempting to set co-worker on fire using Lysol flamethrower in Tomball, Texas

A man in Tomball, Texas, has been arrested for trying to set…
Eruption warning updated for massive volcano as 300,000 Americans prepare for disaster

Update: 300,000 Americans Prepare for Disaster as Massive Volcano Eruption Warning Issued

Alaska’s Mount Spurr has experienced 66 earthquakes in the last week, signaling…
RHOBH star Dorit Kemsley files for divorce from estranged husband PK after his clinch with Ryan Seacrest's ex

Dorit Kemsley, a cast member of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, starts divorce proceedings from her separated spouse PK following his interaction with the former partner of Ryan Seacrest.

The Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills star Dorit Kemsley has finally filed…
Ana Navarro Shades Donald Trump After Alyssa Farrah Griffin Claims Straight Men Do Not Wear Makeup: “Has Anybody Met Donald Trump?”

Ana Navarro Throws Shade at Donald Trump in Response to Alyssa Farrah Griffin’s Claim That Straight Men Don’t Wear Makeup: “Has Anyone Seen Donald Trump?”

The hosts of The View were full of compliments for John Cena…
‘North Of North’s Dogsledding Fetish Sex Scene Is One Of A Kind — And Even Had Star Anna Lambe Feeling “Mortified”

“Unique Dogsledding Sex Scene in ‘North Of North’ Leaves Star Anna Lambe Feeling Embarrassed”

It might be cold in Ice Cove, Nunavut — but North of…
Humiliating NFL Draft moment as Shedeur Sanders' dreams are crushed by brutal prank call

Shedeur Sanders faces an embarrassing prank call that crushes his NFL Draft dreams

Shedeur Sanders’ NFL Draft nightmare took a cruel twist Friday when his…
Aimee Carrero On Why Signing Onto ‘Your Friends And Neighbors’ Was A No-Brainer For Her: “I Love Nothing More Than Subverting A Stereotype”

Aimee Carrero: Embracing Role in ‘Your Friends And Neighbors’ to Challenge Stereotypes

From Elena of Avalor to Elena of Westmont Village in Your Friends…
Virginia Giuffre, Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew accuser, dead at 41 by suicide: report

Report: Woman who accused Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, of wrongdoing dies by suicide at age 41

According to a report, Virginia Giuffre has died by suicide. Giuffre made…
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal, has died

Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew in Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal, has passed away

Virginia Giuffre, who previously accused Prince Andrew of sexually exploiting her as…
Selma Blair shares unbelievable health update amid years-long MS battle

Selma Blair provides incredible update on her health after battling MS for years

Selma Blair shared a positive update on her battle with Multiple Sclerosis,…
What Musk's DOGE nerds never saw coming... and how it could cost Americans billions

Unforeseen Consequences of Musk’s DOGE Enthusiasm Could Result in Billions in Losses for Americans

Experts are warning that Elon Musk’s cuts to waste, fraud and abuse…