GAME ON: Trump Takes a Hammer to Birthright Citizenship, Says 'People Have Wanted This For Decades'

Within days of assuming office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that has sparked widespread misinterpretation, particularly being labeled as “ending birthright citizenship”. This simplification overlooks the complexity surrounding the understanding of citizenship within the 14th Amendment.

Section 1 of the amendment holds significant importance, as it states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s executive order aims to narrow the legal interpretation of this statement. The order instructs the government to withhold legal recognition of citizenship in cases where the individual’s mother was unlawfully present in the U.S. and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth, or when the mother’s presence was lawful but temporary, and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth.

In other words, if the parents are not in the United States legally, then the child is not automatically granted citizenship. 

Trump in Court

The executive order was immediately challenged in court in several states, with groups like the ACLU latching themselves onto the cause, and the Trump administration has already lost in at least one federal court. The judge in that case strongly rebuked Trump’s actions.

“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades,” Senior U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour said. “I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order.”

Coughenour (probably) has a point. The president cannot unilaterally reinterpret an amendment, especially on a question that the Supreme Court had previously settled. But the Trump administration isn’t seeking to just unilaterally change things. It appears his team wants to take this all the way back to the Supreme Court. 

But why?

What Is “Legal”?

The Supreme Court answered the question of birthright citizenship in the late 1800s, in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were legal residents, though not U.S. citizens, living in San Fransisco at the time. The family left America, though Wong came back and was denied entry into the country.

He sued, claiming he was a citizen, and the case went before the Court. Here is what they found:

  • Fourteenth Amendment Interpretation: The amendment’s language—”born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”—was meant to ensure that all persons born on U.S. soil (except specific exclusions) were granted citizenship.
  • Historical Intent: The Court emphasized that the amendment aimed to settle citizenship questions definitively, particularly for children born to foreign parents residing legally in the U.S.
  • Legal Precedents: The Court cited various precedents and interpretations of “jurisdiction,” concluding that Wong Kim Ark was fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction and thus a citizen.

The question comes down to one particular phrase in the amendment: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The Court interpreted it, like most do, to mean that everyone born in the U.S. was automatically “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” making them legal citizens. Some legal scholars, who agree with the Trump administration, argue that it means only those who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (meaning those whose families are legally in the United States) are recognized as citizens.

The Path Forward

The Trump administration could push this ahead, fighting to keep the issue alive all the way to the Supreme Court, forcing the current Court to re-evaluate what the previous Court ruled. 

There are really two ways that the change to our interpretation of birthright citizenship can happen. The first is through an act of Congress, which will probably never happen. The second is to get the Supreme Court to amend or overturn its previous ruling, which is difficult but not impossible. 

There are two objectives here:

  1. Get the Supreme Court to reverse the previous position that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” applies to everyone born in the United States.
  2. Recognize that, under this interpretation, Wong Kim Ark’s parents were “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” because they were legal residents in the United States.

If the Trump administration can convince the Justices to narrowly re-define the legal interpretation of the 14th Amendment, then his executive order will, in fact, have worked – even if the process by which he got there skirted the lines of constitutionality in the first place.

Can He Do It?

Trump’s problem is that he has essentially, two years to get things done. The midterm elections could result in Democrats retaking the House or Senate, and if that is the case, then he loses the opportunity to get much more of his agenda accomplished. Getting Congress to devote time to birthright citizenship takes away from his ability to get other things done, so he has to take the long way around – through the courts, that is.

He certainly could pull it off. He has just the right Supreme Court makeup to have a chance. The originalists on the Court will undoubtedly take a look at the fact that the original intent of the 14th Amendment was to apply to people legally in the U.S. (a fact that is in the congressional record, if you go and read up on what the authors of the amendment were discussing at the time). But it’s still a tall order.

Should He Do It?

In all honesty, I’m not convinced it’s the battle we should have right now. There are more immediate and critical needs in the fight to fix the immigration issue than to tackle birthright citizenship. However, it is something he promised, and he wants to deliver on it. 

It’s one of those long-game plans. This will have very little impact in the near future, but could work long-term to dissuade birth tourism in the U.S. For immigration hawks, it’s a vital piece of the strategy to reshape how America controls its borders and protects its citizenry.

You May Also Like
Tollway scam texts flooding phones across US, especially in Chicago, Illinois, area, affecting I-PASS users

A surge of fraudulent texts targeting I-PASS users in the Chicago, Illinois, region and beyond in the US

CHICAGO (WLS) — The ABC7 Chicago I-Team has a warning about tollway…
After Trump threat, Hamas refuses to release more hostages without phase 2 ceasefire deal

Hamas rejects releasing more hostages until phase 2 ceasefire negotiated following Trump’s warning

President Donald Trump’s recent warning was disregarded by the Hamas terror organization…
Lone wolf attacks surge in the West as terrorism intensifies globally

Increase in solo terrorist attacks in Western countries as global terrorism escalates

According to a new report from the Global Terrorism Index (GTI), lone-wolf…
Bryan Kohberger 911 call and terrifying text messages between surviving roommates on night of the Idaho murders revealed

Revealed: Bryan Kohberger’s 911 Call and Chilling Texts from Roommates on Night of Idaho Murders

Recent text conversations between the two remaining roommates involved in the tragic…
Chicago crime: Sexual assault suspect approaching victims from behind in Logan Square on West Palmer Street, police say

Police Report: Suspect in Sexual Assault Cases Targeting Victims from Behind in Logan Square on West Palmer Street in Chicago

CHICAGO (WLS) — A fourth woman was attacked on the city’s Northwest…
Is ‘In the Lost Lands’ Streaming on Netflix or Amazon Prime Video?

Can I Stream ‘In the Lost Lands’ on Netflix or Amazon Prime Video?

For fans of Game of Thrones, get ready for a new film…
Trump demands firing of TWO MSNBC stars for 'disgraceful' on-air comments

“Trump calls for dismissal of TWO MSNBC hosts over ‘shameful’ televised remarks”

In a dramatic declaration, Donald Trump has stated that Nicolle Wallace and…
Experts say tariffs expected to have big impact on the cost of new home construction

Specialists predict that tariffs will significantly affect the price of building new homes.

President Donald Trump’s new tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada…
Elon Musk's SpaceX loses contact with Starship rocket during latest test flight as spacecraft came down near Turks and Caicos

“SpaceX Encounters Communication Loss with Starship Rocket During Test Flight, Landing Near Turks and Caicos”

Just shy of two months following an explosion that resulted in flaming…
When Do New Episodes Of ‘The Pitt’ Come Out on Max? Episode 10 Premiere Time and More

What is the Release Schedule for New Episodes of ‘The Pitt’ on Max? Premiere Time for Episode 10 and Additional Details

The latest episode of The Pitt on MAX concluded with a shocking…
3 skiers missing after avalanche hits remote mountain range in Alaska

3 skiers lost in Alaska mountain range after avalanche

Three skiers were likely killed when an avalanche swept them away on…
Judge finds Mike Lindell in contempt for failing to turn over documents in Smartmatic defamation case

Mike Lindell found in contempt by judge for not providing documents in Smartmatic defamation lawsuit

A federal judge in Minnesota has found MyPillow CEO and Trump ally…