GAME ON: Trump Takes a Hammer to Birthright Citizenship, Says 'People Have Wanted This For Decades'

Within days of assuming office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that has sparked widespread misinterpretation, particularly being labeled as “ending birthright citizenship”. This simplification overlooks the complexity surrounding the understanding of citizenship within the 14th Amendment.

Section 1 of the amendment holds significant importance, as it states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s executive order aims to narrow the legal interpretation of this statement. The order instructs the government to withhold legal recognition of citizenship in cases where the individual’s mother was unlawfully present in the U.S. and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth, or when the mother’s presence was lawful but temporary, and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the individual’s birth.

In other words, if the parents are not in the United States legally, then the child is not automatically granted citizenship. 

Trump in Court

The executive order was immediately challenged in court in several states, with groups like the ACLU latching themselves onto the cause, and the Trump administration has already lost in at least one federal court. The judge in that case strongly rebuked Trump’s actions.

“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades,” Senior U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour said. “I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order.”

Coughenour (probably) has a point. The president cannot unilaterally reinterpret an amendment, especially on a question that the Supreme Court had previously settled. But the Trump administration isn’t seeking to just unilaterally change things. It appears his team wants to take this all the way back to the Supreme Court. 

But why?

What Is “Legal”?

The Supreme Court answered the question of birthright citizenship in the late 1800s, in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were legal residents, though not U.S. citizens, living in San Fransisco at the time. The family left America, though Wong came back and was denied entry into the country.

He sued, claiming he was a citizen, and the case went before the Court. Here is what they found:

  • Fourteenth Amendment Interpretation: The amendment’s language—”born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”—was meant to ensure that all persons born on U.S. soil (except specific exclusions) were granted citizenship.
  • Historical Intent: The Court emphasized that the amendment aimed to settle citizenship questions definitively, particularly for children born to foreign parents residing legally in the U.S.
  • Legal Precedents: The Court cited various precedents and interpretations of “jurisdiction,” concluding that Wong Kim Ark was fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction and thus a citizen.

The question comes down to one particular phrase in the amendment: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The Court interpreted it, like most do, to mean that everyone born in the U.S. was automatically “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” making them legal citizens. Some legal scholars, who agree with the Trump administration, argue that it means only those who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (meaning those whose families are legally in the United States) are recognized as citizens.

The Path Forward

The Trump administration could push this ahead, fighting to keep the issue alive all the way to the Supreme Court, forcing the current Court to re-evaluate what the previous Court ruled. 

There are really two ways that the change to our interpretation of birthright citizenship can happen. The first is through an act of Congress, which will probably never happen. The second is to get the Supreme Court to amend or overturn its previous ruling, which is difficult but not impossible. 

There are two objectives here:

  1. Get the Supreme Court to reverse the previous position that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” applies to everyone born in the United States.
  2. Recognize that, under this interpretation, Wong Kim Ark’s parents were “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” because they were legal residents in the United States.

If the Trump administration can convince the Justices to narrowly re-define the legal interpretation of the 14th Amendment, then his executive order will, in fact, have worked – even if the process by which he got there skirted the lines of constitutionality in the first place.

Can He Do It?

Trump’s problem is that he has essentially, two years to get things done. The midterm elections could result in Democrats retaking the House or Senate, and if that is the case, then he loses the opportunity to get much more of his agenda accomplished. Getting Congress to devote time to birthright citizenship takes away from his ability to get other things done, so he has to take the long way around – through the courts, that is.

He certainly could pull it off. He has just the right Supreme Court makeup to have a chance. The originalists on the Court will undoubtedly take a look at the fact that the original intent of the 14th Amendment was to apply to people legally in the U.S. (a fact that is in the congressional record, if you go and read up on what the authors of the amendment were discussing at the time). But it’s still a tall order.

Should He Do It?

In all honesty, I’m not convinced it’s the battle we should have right now. There are more immediate and critical needs in the fight to fix the immigration issue than to tackle birthright citizenship. However, it is something he promised, and he wants to deliver on it. 

It’s one of those long-game plans. This will have very little impact in the near future, but could work long-term to dissuade birth tourism in the U.S. For immigration hawks, it’s a vital piece of the strategy to reshape how America controls its borders and protects its citizenry.

You May Also Like
Chicago weather forecast: Chicago snow totals Saturday night into Sunday could reach 1-2 inches

Prediction for Chicago Weather: Snow accumulation in Chicago could be 1-2 inches from Saturday night to Sunday.

CHICAGO (WLS) — More snow is moving into the Chicago area this…
Shattering the 'iron' ceiling: New series 'Guerrera' explores vital role of US female troops in combat

“Breaking Barriers: ‘Guerrera’ Series Shows the Essential Contribution of American Women in Combat”

Over a decade ago, women in combat made history by volunteering for…
Trump makes awkward U-turn on firing 300 federal workers without realizing their crucial roles in defending America

Trump reverses decision to lay off 300 federal employees after understanding their vital role in protecting the nation

Donald Trump has had to make a quick reversal on firing hundreds of…
Border Czar Homan Takes AOC to School After Her Office Hosts Anti-ICE Webinar

Former border official, ICE takes Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to task for hosting webinar against ICE

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the well-known former Brooklyn bartender who is now a congresswoman,…
‘SNL50: The Homecoming Concert’ red carpet arrivals — Jim Belushi, Miley Cyrus and more hit Radio City

“Red Carpet Arrivals at ‘SNL50: The Homecoming Concert’ Feature Jim Belushi, Miley Cyrus, and More at Radio City”

Reporting live from Radio City Music Hall in New York City is…
Leon Rogers, relationship expert Love McPherson join 'Windy City Weekend' for Valentine's Day 2025 episode

Relationship Guru Leon Rogers and Love McPherson to appear on ‘Windy City Weekend’ Valentine’s Day 2025 special

CHICAGO (WLS) — Val Warner and Ryan Chiaverini hosted a special event…
Rodeo rider cheats death when bull's horn slices neck open

Rodeo participant narrowly escapes death as bull’s horn cuts neck.

A brave rodeo performer in Florida narrowly escaped death when the bull…
The Invictus Games are Harry's tribute to the bravery of injured military heroes. But this year they were also the perfect PR opportunity for Meghan ahead of her make-or-break Netflix series... Talk about stealing the show!

Harry’s Invictus Games Shine a Light on Injured Military Heroes, While Meghan Seizes PR Opportunity Before Netflix Series Premiere

After a social media hiatus of nearly a decade, the Duchess of…
Jay-Z teen rape case with Diddy DISMISSED by accuser's attorney as rapper issues emotional statement

Accuser’s attorney dismisses Jay-Z and Diddy’s teen rape case, rapper reacts with emotional statement

Jay-Z’s civil lawsuit, which accused him of raping a 13-year-old in 2000…
Pearl Milling pancake mix recall: Quaker Oats recalls 10K boxes for milk allergy risk

Quaker Oats recalls 10,000 boxes of Pearl Milling pancake mix due to milk allergy risk

10,000 boxes of pancake mix have been recalled by The Quaker Oats…
British woman visiting American dad in Texas found dead in his home

Tragic Discovery: British Woman Visiting Her American Dad in Texas Found Deceased in His Home

Fox News Digital has verified that the death of a 23-year-old British…
Big tech whistleblower Suchir Balaji's cause of death is revealed after parents disputed cops' 'suicide' claim

After disagreeing with the police’s conclusion of suicide, the reason for the death of the big tech whistleblower Suchir Balaji is disclosed by his parents.

OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji took his own life by shooting himself in the head,…