Sam Bankman-Fried was “very resistant” to having investors join the board of directors at FTX, claims Matthew Huang, the co-founder and managing partner of crypto investment firm Paradigm.

The sudden collapse of FTX saw more than a few investors burned, with Paradigm joining a number of venture capital firms including Sequoia, Temasek and BlackRock in funding the rise of the now-bankrupt crypto exchange. 

Testifying on the third day of Bankman-Fried’s trial in a New York Federal Court, Huang claimed Bankman-Fried believed having investors on FTX’s board of directors wouldn’t bring much to the table.

Huang engaged in a handful of conversations with Bankman-Fried ahead of Paradigm making a $125 million investment in the exchange’s staggering $900 million Series B funding round it closed in July 2021.

Huang admitted to not conducting enough due diligence and that he relied too heavily on information supplied by Bankman-Fried.

Despite being concerned by the lack of formal structure at FTX and its potential entanglement with its sister hedge fund Alameda Research, Huang said investors were lured in by the rapid expansion of FTX’s market share in the crypto industry.

Still, Huang noted he and other investors at Paradigm were concerned that Bankman-Fried may have been spending more time working on Alameda instead of FTX, a distraction that would have been at the expense of Paradigm’s investment.

Additionally, Huang noted there were concerns that Alameda may have been receiving preferential treatment from FTX. If these concerns turned out to be true Huang said he was fearful of the reputation damage it may inflict on the company.

Related: College roommate talked to Sam Bankman-Fried about FTX’s $8B hole on a paddle tennis court: Trial

Huang said he was led to believe by Bankman-Fried that Alameda was not being provided with any privileged treatment by FTX. The same day, FTX co-founder Gary Wang testified that Alameda was given access to a near-unlimited flow of capital from the exchange.

Additionally, Huang said he had no knowledge of the alleged commingling of funds between FTX and Alameda Research.

The prosecution asked Huang if his decision to invest in FTX would’ve changed if he’d been told the exchange was allegedly using customer deposits for investment purposes.

“Yes,” Huang replied. “It’s generally understood that customer deposits are sacred.”

Magazine: Blockchain detectives — Mt. Gox collapse saw birth of Chainalysis

Read More: World News | Entertainment News | Celeb News
Cointelegraph

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

President of Paraguay vetoes crypto regulation law

Paraguay’s president, Mario Abdo Benítez, vetoed a bill that sought to recognize…

Industry exec explains why NFT fraud protection falls on brand and not marketplaces

Nonfungible token (NFT) marketplaces should commit to combat fraudulent NFTs, but brands…

Prisma Finance says $540K still at risk, hacker demands team reveal themselves

Decentralized finance (DeFi) firm Prisma Finance says there’s still $540,000 of funds…

Crypto staking: How to pick the best staking coins for passive income

What is crypto staking? Crypto staking involves locking up one’s cryptocurrency holdings…